To many Native Americans, language is a gift from God. They believe it is bestowed
on the people by their Maker, like the ability to breathe or to think. To them, so sacred is the genesis of speech
that they include it in their creation stories.
Language is what makes people who they are, says
Ofelia Zepeda, professor of linguistics at the University of Arizona, and a member of the Tohono O'odham, or desert
people, a Southwestern tribe formerly known as the Papago.
But just as language is born, so can it die. That's
what is so sad about the once-thriving languages of Native American peoples, says Zepeda, an expert on endangered
Indian languages. From Alaska to the Mexican border, from Hawaii to the Canadian frontier, Indian tongues are facing
In some smaller tribes, only a handful of elders
can still communicate in the language of their ancestors. When their generation dies, their language, their world
view and their way of life will also disappear. One expert predicts that more than 175 distinct tongues will become
extinct by 2060.
Recently, language loss has been more gradual and
tribes were unsure how to stop it. "We knew it was happening, but to tell the world was another thing,"
says Zepeda, 46. "It's a sad thing to tell them now."
I met Zepeda in San Francisco at the 25th annual
conference of the California Assn. for Bilingual Education. In a gentle, almost melancholy tone, she talked about
belated efforts to revive moribund Indian languages.
I had been invited to address the conference the
night before, following presentations to six schools whose bilingual programs earned the association's Seal of
Excellence. Washington Elementary in Santa Ana was the only Southern California school among those honored.
I thought bilingual educators themselves would
be an endangered species by now, but I was wrong.
The conference drew more than 7,000 teachers, principals
and parents who rallied around a theme that seems quixotic in our state today: "Bi-literacy for all."
After a demoralizing blow from political efforts to destroy bilingual education, true believers have started to
recoup their confidence.
I couldn't help but compare the drive to defend
bilingual programs with the lonely work of Zepeda and others to rescue dying languages. Both causes require hard,
uphill battles. Ironically, it was the birth of bilingual education a generation ago that sparked many Indians
to focus on saving their own native tongues.
Now it's the story of Native American languages
that gives us a powerful reminder of what's at stake in the debate over bilingual education.
In a previous column, I suggested that this country's
historic hostility toward any language other than English is oppressive and colonial. Some readers--and a talk
show host or two--ridiculed my analysis. But at the time, even I was unaware of the intensity of the U.S. campaign
to obliterate Indian tongues, a linguistic war documented by The Times as part of a series in January on how language
shapes our hearts and minds.
In 1868, for example, a federal commission on Indian
affairs concluded that much of the nation's troubles could be traced to the proliferation of native languages:
"Their barbarous dialect should be blotted out and the English language substituted."
Sound familiar? The American war against Indian languages left a shameful intellectual legacy, for which the government
has barely begun to make amends. In 1990, Congress passed the Native American Languages Act, promising to protect
the nation's unique languages and cultures. As a matter of policy, the law encourages the use of Indian languages
in public schools as a way to enhance student performance. But wait a minute, Washington! I don't think that's
legal here in California.
To be fair, global commerce and communications
are threatening languages all across the globe in an era when English has become the language of success. You can't
fight the future.
But somehow, Zepeda still has hope. Many tribes
are working to rekindle their languages. Native Americans in California are among the most active. But throughout
the country, language preservers are videotaping their grandparents to record their words. They're also writing
new dictionaries, and going to special language camps where the trees and streams and other natural landmarks are
labeled with their Indian names.
"We should have English, but not at the expense
of other languages," says Zavala. "We can have them both. It's not a problem at all."
Agustin Gurza's column appears Tuesday. Readers
can reach Gurza at (714) 966-7712 or email@example.com.
Fading Indian Languages Carry a Powerful Message