|
"A
young man once asked Wilma Mankiller what he should call her. She was then principal chief of the Cherokee Nation,
and twice elected as the leader of some 200,000 people. But this young man was uncomfortable with what he called
a "male" term.
"Should we address you as chieftainess?" he asked. Mankiller didn't say a
word. Then, after hearing the suggestion "chiefette," she responded. "I told him to call me 'Ms.-Chief'
or 'misChief.' "
Mankiller still makes mischief.
She's no longer leader of the nation's second-largest Indian tribe, but she travels
across the country writing and speaking about American Indians, stereotypes and racism. Recently, she spoke in
Seattle at the Urban
Enterprise Center's Forum on Race.
She focused on ideas
Mankiller started working at the Cherokee Nation in 1977 in the community development
department. Then she ran for the office of deputy chief in 1983.
That election was rough because so many voters only wanted to talk about why a woman
was running. It had never happened before.
But Mankiller wanted to talk about her ideas - and how to make them happen. She kept
her focus and day by day stripped away false notions about gender and leadership. She found a way to engage people
in a conversation about the future. She won the election - and two years later was elected principal chief.
The audience is different these days, but Mankiller's ideas are still her strength.
She said our national conversation about race cannot be complete until we can peel away false stereotypes and rewrite
history so that we can include tribal accounts and philosophies.
Left out of civic discourse
The United States has dealt with tribes as governments for more than two centuries.
Yet it's still a surprise to many citizens - including many candidates for public office - that tribes are not
part of the city, county and state systems of government. Tribes were here first and that simple fact ought to
be part of our civic discourse.
Something similar could be said about the land-bridge theory.
Nearly all of our primary and secondary schools teach that early Native Americans walked
across a land bridge from Siberia on a journey to this continent. It's usually said to be a "theory,"
and then written as if it actually happened.But what if the theory is plain wrong? No tribal creation story recalls
a journey from Siberia. What if the crossing went the other direction?
"We've preserved our stories," Mankiller says. And now science is catching
up. "Scientists have found bones (that are dated) before the land bridge. I wonder what they'll come up with
as an explanation."
A justification for conquest
The land-bridge story matters because it was used historically to justify the conquest
of North America. The line went something like this: "Indians are immigrants like everyone else, they just
came earlier."
But science is changing the story. I recently attended a conference on the peopling
of North America and was struck by how much of the research is now coupled with tribal creation stories. Science
is listening more than ever.
But that word has not made its way across society's boundaries; our conversation is
missing important nuance. It's as if we're stuck talking about what's been talked about before.
"I know what happened to our people," Mankiller says. And until that same
story is taught - or at least respected - by the rest of the nation, there won't be an honest dialogue.
But then an honest dialogue is a wonderful reason to make mischief.
Besides, Mankiller says, "I can eliminate any stereotypes about what a chief looks
like."
Wilma Mankiller-Bio
http://www.powersource.com/gallery/people/wilma.html
|